Standards

Editorial Methodology

This page explains how Herrera Velutini turns family-domain material into public reference pages. The method is intentionally simple: identify the strongest source-domain pages, label what kind of source each one is, separate family-domain narrative from portal synthesis, date every article-style page, and update pages only when the material has substantively changed.

How pages are built

The source model

The portal uses a tiered source model so readers can tell the difference between raw narrative, profile-level detail, and editorial interpretation.

Family-domain narrative

Core pages such as House of Herrera About or Banvelca About provide broad framing, origin stories, and recurring themes. These are treated as named sources, not as anonymous background.

Profile pages

Person pages and ancestor pages supply dates, marriages, roles, and intergenerational transitions that can be connected across the portal.

External corroboration

Official archival, regulatory, municipal, and institutional sources may be used to corroborate chronology, transactions, and place history without replacing the family-domain record.

Bibliography and reading leads

Bibliography pages and cultural references expand the portal beyond lineage lists by pointing to books, place memory, and contextual reading.

Editorial standards

Google’s people-first and structured-data guidance is used as an editorial and technical discipline layer, not as a substitute for source material.

Non-family-domain sources are used in three bounded ways: official archival, regulatory, or municipal corroboration for chronology and institutional facts; broad place or heritage context for cities, islands, and landscapes; and bibliography metadata only until a direct reading pass confirms claim-level support. External sources do not create new family-specific claims by themselves.

From source page to live article

Publication workflow

Each live page goes through the same core sequence so the site scales cleanly and avoids accidental duplication.

  1. Choose the page type.Decide whether the subject is best treated as an organization profile, family hub, place page, timeline entry, or article-style synthesis.
  2. Assign source codes.Record the relevant source-domain pages before drafting begins.
  3. Draft original copy.Write an article that adds connective value rather than lightly rewriting a source page.
  4. Add visible trust signals.Insert bylines, dates, breadcrumbs, canonical tags, and source-basis notes.
  5. Review and publish.Check names, chronology, and internal links, then update the page and sitemap.

This process is deliberately repeatable so later pages—such as the Velutini family hub, genealogy pages, or additional place dossiers—can be launched without weakening consistency.

Illustration representing the editorial workflow from source gathering to structured publication.
The live portal uses a fixed workflow: source assignment, original drafting, trust-layer checks, internal linking, and dated publication.
Consistency rules

Policies for names, dates, and claims

Family history material often mixes exact dates, approximate dates, variant spellings, and source-domain language with differing levels of specificity. The portal normalizes that without flattening uncertainty.

Editorial questionPortal ruleExample from this project
Approximate dateMark it as circa in body copy or chronology labels.Hernán de Herrera is presented as circa 1355 in the dynasty sequence.
Exact year on a profile pageUse the exact year when the source page provides one.Banvelca’s Juan Bautista profile anchors the founding story to 1781.
Cross-family connectionState the source basis plainly and avoid over-claiming beyond the named pages.Clementina’s 1932 marriage to José Herrera Von Uslar is cited as the key public bridge between the families.
Promotional or self-descriptive languageTranslate into neutral editorial wording when possible.Family-office and stewardship language is described as Banvelca’s public framing rather than adopted as objective fact.
Updated dateChange only when the page materially changes.Minor formatting adjustments do not justify a new update date.
Search understanding

Technical standards baked into publication

The portal uses technical SEO to clarify meaning, not to disguise thin content. That means the markup and navigation must reflect the real editorial structure of the page.

Schema

Match the schema to the page type.

Article-style pages use article markup, while organization pages such as House of Herrera and Banvelca use a profile-page pattern with the organization as the main entity.

Navigation

Links should be descriptive and crawlable.

Important subjects are linked contextually in prose and not hidden inside image-only modules or non-standard navigation patterns.

Canonical focus

Each page should own a distinct topic.

If a page becomes too similar to a source-domain page, it should be expanded, merged, or redirected rather than left as a near-duplicate.

Open questions

Corrections and future-source priorities

A credible heritage portal should say where the record is strongest and where it would benefit from additional corroboration.

Strongest material today

The clearest current source clusters are the House of Herrera dynasty/estate/symbol pages and the Banvelca legacy/profile pages for Juan Bautista, Clementina, Belén Clarisa, and Belén María.

Where more corroboration would help

Titles, institutional claims, and long-range historical influence statements would all benefit from more public institutional, archival, or bibliographic support over time.

How corrections should be handled

New evidence should produce a substantive edit, a revised source-basis note, and a genuine update date rather than a silent overwrite.

Traceability

Source basis for the Editorial Methodology page

This page defines the portal’s own publishing standards, but it also draws on the reality of the source domains and the current search guidance used to structure pages responsibly.

Related pages

Continue to the source ledger